Reader Response Draft 3
Brooks (2023) informs that Fused
Deposition Modeling (FDM) uses slicing software which translates the design
into directives for the printer. A melted filament, commonly made using
Polylactic Acid (PLA) or Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), is placed onto
a print bed in layers. The product forms while each layer hardens. A feature is
that printers using FDM technology are more affordable compared to other 3D
printing technologies, making them widely available to hobbyists and
industries. FDM can utilize a variety of thermoplastic materials with many
being environmentally friendly. Protolabs Network (n.d.) describes that
material versatility allows users to switch their choice of material depending
on the properties they would like to achieve. During production, FDM can
achieve fast printing speeds and is relatively easy to operate. Finally, FDM
technology enables the creation of intricate shapes and designs that would be
difficult or impractical to achieve otherwise (Engineering Product Design, 2024b).
With its distinct features and
functions, Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) can replace traditional
manufacturing methods in certain areas of today’s industry: rapid prototyping,
waste reduction, and production of spare parts. Despite that, the precision and
accuracy of a product made by traditional manufacturing methods outperforms its
counterpart printed by FDM.
Unlike traditional manufacturing
methods, FDM is ideal for rapid prototyping. “Rapid prototyping (RP) quickly
creates a physical part directly from its CAD model data using various
manufacturing techniques” (Engineering Product Design, 2024a, What is Rapid
prototyping? section). With FDM’s features mentioned earlier, its
resourcefulness and effectiveness allows for fast repeatability during
prototyping. Compared with a traditional method: Computer Numerical Control
(CNC) Machining, the time to produce a similar prototype is much slower due to
a long setup time and numerous machining steps required. Ye (2019) supports
that the machining centers suffer increased material costs because of rising
material consumption. As the development cycle and production costs are lower
compared to traditional manufacturing methods, FDM’s faster iterations and
adjustments make it more suitable for prototyping.
In terms of waste reduction, FDM
generates less waste compared to traditional manufacturing methods. 3D printing
is reported to cause 70% to 90% less production waste than certain traditional
manufacturing techniques (Friedland & Healy, 2023). This is because when
FDM technology is used in a 3-D printer to build a product layer by layer, it
relies only on the amount necessary to construct it. On the other hand,
traditional manufacturing techniques implement methods such as cutting,
drilling and molding when handling material. With this, more waste is generated
as the raw material that is not needed is discarded. Therefore, FDM technology
during 3D printing, has the ability to minimize waste in contrast with
traditional manufacturing methods, making FDM more sustainable for the
environment.
Additionally, FDM can allow
on-demand production of spare parts, benefiting various industries such as
healthcare, aerospace and automation. Implementing this additive manufacturing
method eliminates the necessity for large inventories, shortens lead times and
lessen complexities in supply chains. Additive3D Asia (n.d.) reveals that
components made by traditional manufacturing typically need more time because
molds are essential to aid this process. Moreover, the usage of molds causes
longer setup times and can increase waste from overproduction, further
diminishing efficiency. These molds are also expensive, meaning that the cost
needed for production is increased. Hence, as FDM does not require the need of
molds, production costs can be reduced.
However, there are limitations in
the surface finishes and tolerances for FDM where traditional manufacturing
methods can improve on. Since FDM products tend to have layer lines being
perceptible, post-processing is crucial for a smooth finish (Engineering
Product Design, 2024b). The layer lines also result in variation of the
accuracy of the dimensions which may not meet quality requirements. When
traditional manufacturing methods are used to ensure surface finishing and
tolerances, they “can achieve this by using highly polished finishes” (Monika,
2024, Issues with Surface Finish and Precision section). This allows
improvement of the visual appearance and tighter tolerances of the end-product.
In conclusion, traditional manufacturing techniques are more suitable in
applications where precision and aesthetics are important.
Overall, even though Fused
Deposition Modeling can replace traditional manufacturing methods in the
industry, the quality of its end products might not meet the requirements for
precision and aesthetics. Furthermore, as traditional manufacturing methods may
also have its own advantages to Fused Deposition Modeling, both have their pros
and cons that weigh in the industry.
References
Additive3D Asia. (n.d.). Traditional
Manufacturing VS 3D Printing. Additive3D Asia. https://additive3dasia.com/news/traditional-manufacturing-3d-printing/
Brooks, D. (2023, July 6). FDM
3D Printing: Ultimate Guide. Explore3DPrint. https://explore3dprint.com/fdm-3d-printing-ultimate-guide/
Engineering Product Design. (2024a,
June 7). Rapid prototyping. Engineering Product Design. https://engineeringproductdesign.com/knowledge-base/rapid-prototyping-techniques/
Engineering Product Design. (2024b,
June 21). Material Extrusion – Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM).
Engineering Product Design. https://engineeringproductdesign.com/knowledge-base/material-extrusion/#google_vignette
Friedland, E. & Healy, K.
(2023, April 17). How Sustainable is 3D Printing? Sustainable Plastics. https://www.sustainableplastics.com/news/how-sustainable-3d-printing
Monika. (2024, June 18). 3D
Printing vs Traditional Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Comparison. Goldsupplier.
https://blog.goldsupplier.com/3d-printing-vs-traditional-manufacturing/
Protolabs Network. (n.d.). What
is FDM (fused deposition modeling) 3D printing? Protolabs Network. https://www.hubs.com/knowledge-base/what-is-fdm-3d-printing/#how-does-fdm-3d-printing-work
Ye, R. (2019, July 18). What is
CNC Prototype Machining and How Does it Work? 3ERP. https://www.3erp.com/blog/prototype-machining-pros-and-cons-of-cnc-for-prototyping/
Comments
Post a Comment